Si algún día aspirais a publicar en los grandes Journals, no os podéis perder por nada del mundo este wiki-artículo acerca de la labor de Peer Review, también conocido como refereeing.
Se habla de como se suele proceder, de los diferentes estilos, de casos de papers que nunca tuvieron que pasar el proceso, y de casos sonados de fraude. ¡Y del futuro! Como dice la Ley de Linus, el creador del sistema operativo: "Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow," meaning "If there are enough reviewers, all problems are easy to solve."
Os dejo una cita y a ver si os pico la curiosidad:
Se habla de como se suele proceder, de los diferentes estilos, de casos de papers que nunca tuvieron que pasar el proceso, y de casos sonados de fraude. ¡Y del futuro! Como dice la Ley de Linus, el creador del sistema operativo: "Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow," meaning "If there are enough reviewers, all problems are easy to solve."
Os dejo una cita y a ver si os pico la curiosidad:
"In addition, some sociologists of science argue that peer review makes the ability to publish susceptible to control by elites and to personal jealousy.
Reviewers tend to be especially critical of conclusions that contradict their own views, and lenient towards those that accord with them. At the same time, elite scientists are more likely than less established ones to be sought out as referees,
particularly by high-prestige journals or publishers. As a result, it has been argued, ideas that harmonize with the elite's are more likely to see print and to appear in premier journals than are iconoclastic or revolutionary ones."
Etiquetas: ciencia politica
It is an online Pinoy tv replay for Philippines people inside or outside the country.